Physiotherapy website design for London clinics

No. The published case study is a London hair studio, and the reason it is on this page is that the failure is the same shape: a business whose bookings depended on somebody remembering. If you want to see how I work before committing to a build, the audit is the small version and the free teardown is smaller still.

Builds start at £3,400 and the audit is £340, deducted in full if you go ahead. For a clinic the figure usually turns on how many conditions need their own page and whether the rebooking and drop-off work has to run inside your clinic software or beside it. Every figure is on pricing.

Partly, and the honest split is worth knowing before you spend anything. A website will not send you more Bupa or AXA patients, because that flow is a contract rather than a search result. What it does change is the self-pay side and the drop-off rate, and drop-off costs you on insurer work too, since an abandoned course is an outcome your funder is also measuring.

That is what the audit establishes rather than what I promise upfront. The question is what your system will let an outside tool read and write, and the answers vary widely. Where it is closed, the rebooking and follow-up work runs alongside it, which is slower to set up and still beats nobody noticing that a patient stopped coming.

I build to what the HCPC and your professional body require of a clinic website, and I put the constraints in writing during the audit so nothing surfaces after launch. I will not write your clinical claims or decide what outcomes you may advertise. That is yours, and a developer offering to take it off your hands is adding risk rather than removing work.

Then do not buy a build, and I would rather say that here than discover it on a call. A full clinic with a waiting list has a scheduling problem, and the useful work is digital operations or nothing at all. Come back when the diary has gaps in it, or when the gaps are in the wrong places.