Services

Website audit service

Every path an enquiry can take, followed end to end.

A website audit service is a five-working-day written review of your site, funnel, booking and backend, delivered as a fix list ordered by what each problem costs you. It is £340, deducted in full from a build. You know something in the funnel is losing money; the audit replaces the guess with an ordered list.

Book a free callSee pricing

What you get

  • A written review of your site, funnel, booking, CRM and backend
  • Every issue found, with what it is costing you and why it happens
  • A prioritised fix list, ordered by impact rather than by effort
  • The two or three things I would do first, and what I would leave alone
  • Delivered in 5 working days from the moment you send access
  • Yours to keep and hand to anyone, whether or not I do the work

Audit delivered in 5 working days

From the moment you send access, not from some later kickoff. The written plan follows 2 working days after. Most studios I looked at will not tell you a date at all.

How it runs

  1. 5 working daysAudit

    I go through your site, funnel, booking, CRM and backend, and find where the friction and the leaks are.

  2. 2 working daysPlan

    A written breakdown of what works, what is costing you, and what to fix first. In order, with reasons.

  3. 2 to 6 weeksRebuild

    I fix or rebuild the parts that need it: site, client flow, intake, automation, backend. Scoped and priced before it starts, with 30 days of changes included.

  4. 2 monthsWarranty

    If something I built breaks in the first two months, I fix it. No ticket, no invoice, no argument about whose fault it is.

  5. Monthly, optionalSupport

    After the warranty ends I stay on to maintain and improve it, if you want me to.

Why the audit exists as its own thing

Almost every studio will give you a proposal. Very few will give you a diagnosis you can act on without them, and the difference matters, because a proposal is written to be accepted while a diagnosis is written to be correct.

So the audit is a standalone product with its own deliverable and its own price, and it is written so that another developer could pick it up and do the work. That constraint keeps it honest. If the recommendation only makes sense when I am the one implementing it, it is not a finding, it is a pitch.

What a website audit service covers

The site, first: structure, messaging, conversion path, speed, what search engines and AI assistants can actually read, and whether the pages you care about are reachable at all. That last one sounds trivial and is the single most common serious problem I find, because navigation that uses anchors instead of real links leaves whole sections of a site invisible.

Then the funnel around it: forms, where they deliver, how quickly a first reply goes out, what happens to someone who does not reply, and whether anyone owns that. Then the backend: your CRM, whether the data in it can be trusted, and how much of your week is spent moving information between tools by hand.

Read one before you buy one

A real audit is published in full on this site, anonymised: a London osteopathy clinic, six findings in fix order, with the cost and effort of each and what the paid version adds. If the format does not look useful to you, it is better to find out there than after paying £340.

The opening of the published sample audit on ordstudio.cc: a real audit on a real clinic, with the enquiry path section visible
The sample audit as published: the clinic is not named, the findings are in fix order, and the parts that need the owner's access are marked.

Ordered by impact, not by effort

A fix list sorted by how easy things are is comfortable and mostly useless, because the easy items are easy precisely because they do not touch anything important. So the list is ordered by what it is costing you, and the effort is noted next to each item rather than deciding the order.

You will usually find that two or three items account for most of the loss, and that the rest can wait a quarter without anything bad happening. Knowing which is which is most of the value.

Five working days, from access

The clock starts when you send access, not at a kickoff meeting scheduled for the following week. Five working days later the document is in your inbox, and the written plan follows two days after that.

I publish that timeline because it is unusual. Of the studios I looked at while planning this site, most put the price behind a mandatory call and almost none committed to a date for anything. A date you can hold me to is worth more than a number I could quietly revise.

If you are not ready for this

Send me your URL by email and you will get a written teardown back within two working days, no call and no pitch. It is shorter and less thorough than the audit, but it will tell you whether the audit is worth buying, which is the question you actually have right now.

Questions people ask before we start

What do I actually get at the end?

A written document, not a call recording. Every issue found, what it is costing you, the fix, and the order I would do them in. It is yours to keep and hand to any developer, including one who is not me.

What do you need from me before it starts?

Access, and roughly how many enquiries you get. That is it. The clearer you are about what a good month looks like, the more useful the priority order will be.

Is this just an automated report?

No. Automated tools are part of it, because they are good at finding broken things quickly, but a crawler cannot tell you that your booking flow asks a question that makes people abandon it. That part is read by hand.

Do I have to hire you for the fixes?

No, and the audit is written on that assumption. It is a standalone deliverable with enough detail that another developer can act on it. If you want me to do the work afterwards, the audit becomes the scope.

How is this different from the free audit call?

The call is thirty minutes and gives you the two or three things I would fix first. The audit is five days and covers the whole system in writing, with the reasoning and the order. The call is a sample of it.

How much does a website audit cost?

£340, and it is the one figure on this site that is not a "from". Five working days, the same number whatever size the site is. It is deducted in full from the build if you go ahead, so anyone who hires me afterwards pays nothing for it. You can buy the audit directly, and the rest of the figures are on pricing.

What does a website audit include?

The site (structure, messaging, conversion path, speed, what search engines and AI assistants can read, whether every page is reachable), the funnel around it (forms, where they deliver, first-reply time, follow-up), and the backend (CRM, data quality, the manual handoffs). Every finding has what it costs you, why it happens and the fix, in order of impact.

Why start with strategy instead of just fixing things?

Because a good-looking site that does not convert is money down the drain. Deciding who the page is for and what action it should drive is what makes the rest of the decisions fast and cheap.

What if the audit says my site is fine?

Then it says that, and you have saved yourself a rebuild. Sometimes the site is not the problem and the loss is in follow-up or in the CRM. That is a genuinely useful answer to get in five days.

Not sure this is the one you need?

Book a free 30 minutes. Bring your site and roughly how many enquiries you get. You leave with the two or three things I would fix first, whether or not we end up working together.

Prefer not to get on a call? Send your URL to contact@ordstudio.cc and you get a written teardown back within two working days. No call, no pitch.

Book a free call